c에서 포인터 어드레스의 혼동

#include<stdio.h>
struct person{
   int age;
   float weight;
};
int main(){
   struct person *personPtr, person1;
   personPtr = &person1;
   printf("Enter age: ");
   scanf("%d", &personPtr->age); // why use &personPtr->age, shouldn't it just be personPtr->age since personPtr is itself a pointer. 
   printf("Enter weight: ");
   scanf("%f", &personPtr->weight); // similarly here: should it be personPtr->weight instead. Why the & in front of personPtr, I thought & means address, so wouldn't it means address of the pointer which seems wrong here if we want to show the weight value. 
   printf("Displaying:\n");
   printf("Age: %d\n", personPtr->age);
   printf("weight: %f", personPtr->weight);
   // however if I do: printf("weight: %f", &personPtr->weight); this doesn't print the value of weight. So it has to do with the scanf function? 
   return 0;
}

struct A {
   int x;
   int y;
};

struct A f1;
struct A *f2 = &f1;

uthread_mutex_t uthread_mutex_create () {
  uthread_mutex_t mutex = malloc (sizeof (struct uthread_mutex));
  mutex->holder = 0;
  mutex->reader_count = 0;
  spinlock_create   (&mutex->spinlock); \\ why &mutex, instead of just mutex?????
  uthread_initqueue (&mutex->waiter_queue);
  uthread_initqueue (&mutex->reader_waiter_queue);
  return mutex;
}

personPtr = &person1;

scanf("%d", &personPtr->age);

scanf("%d", &( personPtr->age ));